Case Report
Localized Idiopathic Cemental Hyperplasia involving all four third molars: Report of a Rare Case
Abstract
“Cemental Hyperplasia” or “Hypercementosis” a non-neoplastic, hereditary condition characterized by excessive deposition of cementum in continuation with the normal radicular cementum. This condition is associated with various factors like developmental disorders, inflammation in the root apex, aging and systemic conditions, however most of the cases of hypercementosis are found to be idiopathic nature. Most commonly this disease entity affects posterior teeth and occurs as an isolated or involve multiple teeth or can be seen as generalized form. The purpose of this article is to present a rare case of occurrence of cemental hyperplasia or hypercementosis in an Indian female patient.
Keywords: Cemental hyperplasia, Functional teeth, Hypercementosis, Radiographic examination, Third molars
Introduction
“Cemental Hyperplasia” also called as “Hypercementosis” is an abnormal excessive deposition of cementum on the root surface exceeding physiological limit of the tooth. It is characterized by general thickening of the cementum with nodular enlargement of the apical third portion of the root [1].
The prevalence of hypercementosis varies with different population studied and varies from 0.12% to 84%. Studies performed among Turkish, German and Iranian populations found a prevalence of 0.2%, 2.4% and 0.12% respectively [2-4]. The variation in prevalence rates may due to different diagnostic tools used for the evaluation. For evaluation of hypercementosis, conventional radiographs such as panoramic and periapical radiographs have been used in most studies. Recently advanced imaging techniques like Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scans have been used in the diagnosis of hypercementosis [5]. This condition is more common in males seen with a prevalence of 0.3% compared to females in whom the prevalence is just about 0.02%. However, it is also reported that no gender-related differences exist pertaining to this entity and some reports showed an increased incidence of hypercementosis in females [2-4]. This may be due to difference in the diagnostic evaluation method employed and different population sample studied.
Occurrence of cemental hyperplasia influence and complicates some dental procedures during treatment such as endodontic and extraction procedures [6,7]. Various therapeutic modifications should be followed during these dental procedures in teeth associated with hypercementosis [6,7]. Therefore, knowledge about this condition is highly among all dental specialties to detect, diagnose and provide appropriate dental care to the patient. Hence, the present article was prepared to enlighten the existing literature pertaining to occurrence of cemental hyperplasia by presenting a case of hypercementosis which occurred in Indian female patient.
Case Report
A 38-year-old female patient reported to a private dental clinic complaining of pain in the lower left back tooth region since past ten days. Patient was well nourished, moderately built with well behaviour. Patient did not show any history of past illness or signs and symptoms of systemic disorder, metabolic or syndromic diseases. There was no history of previous hospitalization or any orthodontic treatment taken in the past. Intraoral examination was performed which showed an erupting mandibular left third molar covered with inflamed peri-coronal flap. On contralateral side, the third molar was erupted and visible in the oral cavity. In the upper arch both right and left third molars were not erupted clinically. No other dental findings were observed apart from this. To confirm the presence of upper third molars and to see the condition of the lower left third molar a radiographic examination was carried out. On radiographic examination (orthopantomograph), mandibular left third molar was found with normal vertical position with insufficient space for its eruption (Figure 1). On further examination, it was found that roots of all third molars was bulky and bulbous with blunt root apices. The radiopacity was found all around the root encompassing entire length of the roots (Figure 1). This radiographic feature was not observed in other teeth. Finally based on the literature evidence and radiographic findings the case was diagnosed as localized idiopathic cemental hyperplasia or hypercementosis involving all four third molars. As patient’s chief complaint was associated with left lower third molar, a treatment plan consisting of surgical extraction of this particular tooth was made and patient was scheduled for the surgical extraction under local anaesthesia.
Figure 1: Orthopantomograph showing localized Cemental Hyperplasia or Hypercementosis involving roots of all four third molars (yellow arrows)
Discussion
There is no exact etiology behind the appearance of hypercementosis in human teeth. Literature shows various factors responsible for occurrence of hypercementosis like functional stress due the occlusal forces, incorporation of periodontal cementicles during physiologic cementum deposition, traumatic occlusion, continuous dental eruption or supra eruption, reactionary deposition as a response to periapical inflammatory processes and systemic factors like acromegaly, paget’s disease, hypertropic arthritis, thyroid diseases and atherosclerosis [8].
Reports have shown a correlation between age and cementum thickness in erupted and in functional teeth. The occurrence of hypercementosis is related to conditions like functional stress arising from continuous dental eruption, occlusive force and incorporation of periodontal cementicles during physiologic deposition. It is shown that functional teeth exhibit a lower frequency of hypercementosis compared to non-functional teeth. The continuous occlusive force might inhibit formation of cementum around roots to maintain shock absorption rather than adhesion to surrounding bony tissue [5]. The severity of hypercementosis increases with age of the patient. This has been shown in a recent CBCT study performed by Ohbayashi et al. Authors showed an increase in severity of hypercementosis as follows. In 19 years of age 0%, in 20-24 years 14.1%, in 25-29 years 57.7%, in 30-39 years 83%, in 40-49 years 92.7%, 50-59 years 93.4% and in 60 years 96.8% of cementum deposition was noticed. In this study authors also found that the incidence was significantly less for occluded teeth compared to non-occluded teeth [5]. A study involving 22,000 affected teeth revealed that the mandibular molars were reported most frequently followed by the mandibular and maxillary second premolars and the mandibular first premolars [6].
On radiographic examination, the excess cementum formed in this condition was diagnosed of two types [9]. In one type, the secondary cementum appears with similar density as compared to primary cementum and dentin. In another type, the secondary cementum appears less dense and is clearly differentiated from the primary cementum and dentin [10-12]. In the present case, on radiographic examination the deposition of secondary cementum was categorized as type I because the cementum appeared similar in density as of primary cementum and dentin. The roots in these teeth affected by hypercementosis are separated from the periapical alveolar bone by a normal-appearing periodontal ligament space along with normal architecture of surrounding lamina dura.
Classification of Hypercementosis/Cemental Hyperplasia
The rare entity, hypercementosis has been classified by various authors in numerous ways based on different criteria. Based on 1,160 CBCT image analysis, the severity of the hypercementosis occurring in mandibular third molars were evaluated by Ohbayashi et al [5] in 2021 and classified this condition into four types as Grade 0 to 3 (Table 1). Based on this classification, the hypercementosis condition occurring in the case presented here was classified as Grade 3. Because in all four third molars the hypercementosis was surrounding the entire root surface from cervical third of root to the root apex.
Table 1: Grading of Hypercementosis based on CBCT evaluation (Given by Ohbayashi et al in 2021) [5]
Grade | Description |
---|---|
0 | No hypercementosis present |
1 | Hypercementosis surrounding less than half of the root surface |
2 | Hypercementosis surrounding more than half of the root surface |
3 | Hypercementosis surrounding the entire root surface |
Pinheiro et al [8] classified hypercementosis into three types based on the macroscopic appearance and it is shown in Table 2. Among these three types, the focal type was the most common type observed in many patients.
Table 2: Pinheiro et al classification on Hypercementosis [8]
Type | Description |
---|---|
Club shaped | Cementum forming around multiple foci of tooth roots |
Focal | Cementum formation is limited to the root apex |
Circular Cemental Hyperplasia (CCH) | Cementum formation around the entire root surface |
Based on Pinheiro classification [8], the present case was classified as Circular cemental hyperplasia (CCH).
Based on the number of teeth affected with cementum deposition, there are two types of hypercementosis as mentioned in the literature. They are localized and generalized type (Table 3) [1-3].
Table 3: Types of Hypercementosis [1-3]
Type | Description |
---|---|
Localized | • Affects single tooth • Presents as generalized thickening of cementum with nodular thickening of apical third of root |
Generalized | • Characterized by increased thickness of cementum involving all teeth • Classical feature of Paget’s disease or • Most of the time associated with systemic conditions such as calcinosis, acromegaly, thyroid goitre, rheumatic fever and arthritis |
Rushton and Cooke in 1959 explained that in rare cases, excessive occlusal trauma may lead to the formation of serrated hypercementosis or cemental spikes which follows the course of Sharpey’s fibers [12-15]. Jeddy et al in 2014 [7] reported an unusual occurrence of hypercementosis in the form of multiple cemental spikes distributed throughout the entire length of the root similar to Rushton and Cooke’s explanation. In 2015, Vijay and Chandan [6] reported a case of third molar in a 49-year-old Indian male patient in which following extraction the third molar exhibited a mammoth, dumbbell-shaped disto-buccal root due to excess deposition of cementum. This clinical feature is not described in none of the above classification systems. This indicates the necessity in upgrading of the existing classification system pertaining to cemental hyperplasia and should be incorporated into the existing literature including text books and atlas of dental anomalies.
The occurrence of hypercementosis is associated with several practical and clinical significances [13,16]. The influence of hypercementosis on endodontic prognosis and its direct influence on therapeutic procedures has a controversy in an endodontic field. There is a dilemma regarding whether to keep instrumentation and root canal filling above or beyond the cementum-canal junction in teeth with hypercementosis [8]. Moreover, hypercementosis also impairs apical limits for root canal preparation during endodontic treatment.
The diagnosis of third molar condition is highly essential following radiographic examination before the procedure of extraction [17-21]. Because surgical removal of third molars involves some occurrence of potential risks like inferior alveolar nerve damage, cortical bone fracture, postoperative infection and inflammation and lingual nerve damage. Therefore, presence of hypercementosis in turn complicates the surgical removal and its associated complications as well as post-operative sequel [22-23]. In some cases, sectioning of the tooth is required for easy removal of the impacted or erupted teeth. Recently, advanced imaging tools such as CBCT plays a major role in diagnosing such morphological variations occurring in third molars, its relation with adjacent anatomic structures and in treatment planning [22-24]. Very rarely hypercementosis occurs in more extensive form leading to fusion of two or more adjacent teeth by a layer of cementum [16]. This condition is called as acquired concrescence in the dental anomalies’ literature. Nagaveni NB [16] recently published a rare case of concrescence between maxillary second and third molars in an Indian patient which was successfully extracted through surgical procedure.
It is been shown that functional stress is not the etiologic factor in many cases of hypercementosis [11]. Because third molar as like first molars are rarely or sometimes don’t bear the brunt of the occlusal stress. Even in the present case stress was not the etiologic factor. Therefore, this factor was also ruled out. Moreover, in a tooth with absence of opposing tooth, hypercementosis is usually manifest as a nodular thickening of the apical third of the root and occurs as an attempt to maintain the width of the periodontal ligament and to compensate the accelerated eruption of tooth. In the present case, patient was not having any systemic or metabolic diseases [6-10]. Therefore, these conditions were also ruled out and finally it was considered as due to aging or idiopathic nature, the hyperplasia of cementum might have occurred in the present case as reported in other publications.
In differential diagnosis, all radiopaque structures that occur in the vicinity of the root such as a dense bone island or mature cemento-osseous dysplasia should be considered [1]. The peculiar differentiating characteristic feature is the presence of the periodontal membrane space around the tooth with hypercementosis cases. Other condition that also should be considered is the small cementoblastomas [1-6]. In addition to these, sometimes severely dilacerated roots also give the appearance of cemental hyperplasia [1].
Conclusion
Occurrence of cemental hyperplasia or hypercementosis as presented in this article alarms all dental practitioners about the possible presentation of this rare condition during general dental practice. Clinicians should use either conventional radiographs or advanced imaging techniques before initiating any dental procedure as presence of hypercementosis influence the treatment outcome or complicates the treatment procedure.
References
-
Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Bouquot JE. Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. 2009, 3rd Edition New Delhi Elsevier: 96-97.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Eren Y, Erdal O, Serdar B, Emin K, Enes G. Evaluation of the frequency and characteristics of hypercementosis in the Turkish population with cone-beam computed tomography. Niger J Clin Pract. 2017; 20: 724-728.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Haghanifar S, Moudi E, Abesi F, Kheirkhah F, Arbabzadegan N, Bijani A et al. Radiographic evaluation of dental anomaly prevalence in a selected Iranian population. J Dent (Shiraz), 2019; 20: 90-94.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Burklein S, Jansen S, Schafer E. Occurrence of hypercementosis in a German population. J Endod. 2012; 38: 1610-1612.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Ohbayashi N, Wamasing P, Tonami K, Kurabayashi T. Incidence of hypercementosis in mandibular third molars determined using cone beam computed tomography. J Oral Sci. 2021 Mar 31;63(2):179-183.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Vijay R, Chandan S. Hypercementosis – Review of literature and report of a case of mammoth, dumbbell-shaped hypermentosis. J Indian Aca Oral Med Radiol. 2015; 27(1)L 160-163.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Jeddy N, Radhika T, Krithika C, Saravanan R, Prabakar R. Localized multiple cemental excrescences: A rare presentation of hypercementosis. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014; 8(5):
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Pinheiro BC, Pinheiro TN, Capelozza ALA, Consolaro A, A scanning electron microscopic study of hypercementosis J Appl Oral Sci 2008 16(6):380-4.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Soni NN, A microradiographic and polarized light study of cementum in Paget’s disease J Oral Med 1969 24:27-30.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Elsayed SA, Ayed Y, Alolayan AB, Farghal LM, Niger KS. Radiographic evaluation and determination of hypercementosis patterns in Al-Madinah Al-Munawwarah, Saudi Arabia: a retrospective cross-sectional study. J Clin Pract, 2019; 22: 957-960.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Azaz B, Ulmansky M, Moshev R, Sela J. Correlation between age and thickness of cementum in impacted teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1974; 38: 691-694.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Stamfelj I, Vidmar G, Cvetk E, Gaspersic D. Cementum thickness in multirooted human molars: a histometric study by light microscopy. Ann Anat 2008, 190: 129-139.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Weinberger A. Clinical significance of hypercementosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1954; 7: 79-87.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Warrier SA, Vinayachandran D. Irregular periapical radiopacity in mandibular premolars and molars. Case Rep Dent 2014; 910843.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
15. Solheim T. Dental cementum apposition as an indicator of age. Scand J Dent Res. 1990; 98: 510-519.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Nagaveni NB. Rare occurrence of cementum twinninig (Concrescence) of teeth – Report of case. Glob J Res Dent Sci. 2023; 3(4): 9-11.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Nagaveni NB, Umashankar KV, Ashwini KS, Chiranjeevi H. “Inversion” of impacted Mandibular third molar in ascending ramus of the mandible – Report of rarest case. Clin Pathol. 2024; 8(1): 000185.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Nagaveni NB, Umashanakara KV. Maxillary molar with dens evaginatus and multiple cusps: Report of a rare case and literature review. Int J Oral Health Sci. 2013; 3(2): 92.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Nagaveni NB. Idiopathic intracoronal resorption in impacted maxillary tooth – Report of a rare case. 2024; 23(2): 1-4.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Nagaveni NB, Umashankar KV. A giant radicular cyst involving the left maxillary sinus diagnosed on CBCT image – Report of a rare case. J Oral Health Dent. 2023; 7(1): 591-595.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Nagaveni NB. Concomitant existence of tooth agenesis (agenesis of four second premolars) and supernumerary tooth (dens distomolar) – Report of a rarest case. J Dent Sci, 2024; 9(1): 000391.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Lai PT, Yang SF, Lin YM, Ho YC. Computer – aided design – guided endodontic microsurgery for a mandibular molar with hypercementosis. J Formos Med Assoc, 2019; 118: 1471-1472.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Matzen LH, Villefrance JS, Norholt SE, Bak J, Wenzel A. Cone beam CT and treatment decision of mandibular third molars: removal vs. coronectomy – a 3 – year audit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2019; 49: 20190250.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Gu L, Zhu C, Chen K, Liu X, Tang Z. Anatomic study of the position of the mandibular canal and corresponding mandibular third molar on cone-beam computed tomography images. Surg Radiol Anat, 2018; 40: 609-614.
Publisher | Google Scholor
Copyright: © 2024 Nagaveni N B, this is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.